ISSN 2394-5125
 
2021, Vol: 8, Issue: 1
8/1Current Issue Online First Archive Aims and Scope Abstracting & Indexing Most Accessed Articles Most Downloaded Articles Most Cited Articles
Required files to be uploaded

Copyright

Research Article 


Studying the Relationship Between Meritocracy and Administrative System Health in Government Organizations: By Explaining the Mediating Role of Mackenzie Model

Mohammad Ali Mostafapour, Roohalla Samiee, Mahmood Reza Mostaghimi, Mahmood Reza Cheraghali.

Abstract
The country's administrative system, despite all efforts to reform it, still lacks the necessary efficiency and
accountability; one of the main reasons is the neglect of meritocracy and its fundamental role in the evolution and
health of the administrative system. Therefore, the present study investigates the relationship between meritocracy
and administrative system health with respect to the mediating role of Mackenzie model (2014) variables. This
research was applied in terms of purpose, and done as descriptive-survey. The statistical population of the study was
950 middle managers of government organizations in Golestan province. The sample size was 274 according to
Krejcie and Morgan table and simple random sampling method was used for sampling. Data analysis was performed
by structural equation method with Smart PLS software. The results showed that there was no significant
relationship between meritocracy with the variables of social responsibility and knowledge management, but there
was a direct and significant relationship between meritocracy with the variables of administrative system health,
organizational justice, social capital, organizational ethics, job performance, and empowerment. Also, there was an
inverse and significant relationship between meritocracy and political behavior, and there was a direct and
significant relationship between social responsibility, organizational justice, social capital, organizational ethics, job
performance, empowerment with the health of the administrative system. There was a significant inverse
relationship between political behavior and the health of administrative system and also there was no significant
relationship between knowledge management and the health of administrative system. The findings also confirmed
the mediating role of organizational justice, political behavior, social capital, organizational ethics, job performance,
and empowerment, and did not confirm the mediating role of social responsibility and knowledge management

Key words: Meritocracy, Administrative System Health, Mackenzie Model, Government Organization


 
ARTICLE TOOLS
Abstract
PDF Fulltext
How to cite this articleHow to cite this article
Citation Tools
Related Records
 Articles by Mohammad Ali Mostafapour
Articles by Roohalla Samiee
Articles by Mahmood Reza Mostaghimi
Articles by Mahmood Reza Cheraghali
on Google
on Google Scholar


How to Cite this Article
Pubmed Style

Mohammad Ali Mostafapour, Roohalla Samiee, Mahmood Reza Mostaghimi, Mahmood Reza Cheraghali. Studying the Relationship Between Meritocracy and Administrative System Health in Government Organizations: By Explaining the Mediating Role of Mackenzie Model. JCR. 2021; 8(1): 415-428. doi:10.31838/jcr.08.01.48

Web Style

Mohammad Ali Mostafapour, Roohalla Samiee, Mahmood Reza Mostaghimi, Mahmood Reza Cheraghali. Studying the Relationship Between Meritocracy and Administrative System Health in Government Organizations: By Explaining the Mediating Role of Mackenzie Model. http://www.jcreview.com/?mno=51185 [Access: February 01, 2021]. doi:10.31838/jcr.08.01.48

AMA (American Medical Association) Style

Mohammad Ali Mostafapour, Roohalla Samiee, Mahmood Reza Mostaghimi, Mahmood Reza Cheraghali. Studying the Relationship Between Meritocracy and Administrative System Health in Government Organizations: By Explaining the Mediating Role of Mackenzie Model. JCR. 2021; 8(1): 415-428. doi:10.31838/jcr.08.01.48


Vancouver/ICMJE Style

Mohammad Ali Mostafapour, Roohalla Samiee, Mahmood Reza Mostaghimi, Mahmood Reza Cheraghali. Studying the Relationship Between Meritocracy and Administrative System Health in Government Organizations: By Explaining the Mediating Role of Mackenzie Model. JCR. (2021), [cited February 01, 2021]; 8(1): 415-428. doi:10.31838/jcr.08.01.48


Harvard Style

Mohammad Ali Mostafapour, Roohalla Samiee, Mahmood Reza Mostaghimi, Mahmood Reza Cheraghali (2021) Studying the Relationship Between Meritocracy and Administrative System Health in Government Organizations: By Explaining the Mediating Role of Mackenzie Model. JCR, 8 (1), 415-428. doi:10.31838/jcr.08.01.48


Turabian Style

Mohammad Ali Mostafapour, Roohalla Samiee, Mahmood Reza Mostaghimi, Mahmood Reza Cheraghali. 2021. Studying the Relationship Between Meritocracy and Administrative System Health in Government Organizations: By Explaining the Mediating Role of Mackenzie Model. Journal of Critical Reviews, 8 (1), 415-428. doi:10.31838/jcr.08.01.48


Chicago Style

Mohammad Ali Mostafapour, Roohalla Samiee, Mahmood Reza Mostaghimi, Mahmood Reza Cheraghali. "Studying the Relationship Between Meritocracy and Administrative System Health in Government Organizations: By Explaining the Mediating Role of Mackenzie Model." Journal of Critical Reviews 8 (2021), 415-428. doi:10.31838/jcr.08.01.48


MLA (The Modern Language Association) Style

Mohammad Ali Mostafapour, Roohalla Samiee, Mahmood Reza Mostaghimi, Mahmood Reza Cheraghali. "Studying the Relationship Between Meritocracy and Administrative System Health in Government Organizations: By Explaining the Mediating Role of Mackenzie Model." Journal of Critical Reviews 8.1 (2021), 415-428. Print. doi:10.31838/jcr.08.01.48


APA (American Psychological Association) Style

Mohammad Ali Mostafapour, Roohalla Samiee, Mahmood Reza Mostaghimi, Mahmood Reza Cheraghali (2021) Studying the Relationship Between Meritocracy and Administrative System Health in Government Organizations: By Explaining the Mediating Role of Mackenzie Model. Journal of Critical Reviews, 8 (1), 415-428. doi:10.31838/jcr.08.01.48


Author Login Reviewer Login About Publisher Editorial Policies Peer Review Policy Editorial & Peer Review Process Author's Rights and Obligations Publication Ethics and Publication Malpractice Statement Conflict of Interest Policy Plagiarism Policy Protection of Research Participants (Statement On Human And Animal Rights) Privacy Policy Publication Ethics and Publication Malpractice Statement Corrections, Retractions & Expressions of Concern Self-Archiving Policies Statement of Informed Consent Advertising Policy Terms of Use License Information
This is an open access journal which means that all content is freely available without charge to the user or his/her institution. Users are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of the articles in this journal without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author. This is in accordance with the Budapest Open Access Initiative (BOAI) definition of open access.
The articles in Journal of Critical Reviews are open access articles licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/) which permits unrestricted, non-commercial use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the work is properly cited.
Copyright © 2021 Journal of Critical Reviews All Rights Reserved. Subject to change without notice from or liability to Journal of Critical Reviews.
For best results, please use Internet Explorer or Google Chrome

Contact Information


Journal of Critical Review,
Tower 23/4,
Jalan ampang,
Kuala Lumpur, malaysia

editorial.jcr@gmail.com